Now accepting guest editorial from SAP, Oracle, Workday and ServiceNow practitioners.Pitch a guide
The Sign-Off Table

Lesson 4 of 5

Handover to the run organization

8 min

At the end of hypercare, the project hands the solution to the people who will run it for years: the internal application support team, an application management partner, the SAP operations team under RISE, or a mix. A good handover is not a meeting at the end. It is a structured transition that starts weeks before exit and ends when the run organization can operate alone.

Who runs Contoso after hypercare

BusinessProcess owners and key users: first help, business priorities, acceptance of changes
Application supportContoso IT application team: tickets, configuration changes, small enhancements
Partner supportApplication management partner under contract for development and specialist areas
SAP operationsUnder RISE, technical operations as defined in the roles and responsibilities document
SAP SupportProduct incidents and SAP notes
The run organization for Contoso. Each layer must know what it now owns.
The Sign-Off Table · thesignofftable.com/academy/sap-pmo-302

What the handover pack contains

ItemWhy the run organization needs it
Open tickets with history and workaroundsThey inherit the backlog and must not re-investigate known issues
Known errors and workarounds listFaster resolution of repeat issues
Solution documentationProcesses, configuration decisions, custom developments and interfaces in scope
Operations runbooksBatch job schedule, interface monitoring, period-end tasks, restart procedures
Monitoring setupAlerts, thresholds and recipients in SAP Cloud ALM, re-pointed to run teams
Test assetsRegression test cases, test plans and data needs, linked to solution processes
Contacts and contractsWho to call at partners and SAP; service levels and escalation paths

Contents of Contoso's handover pack.

Transition in stages

  1. Weeks 1–2ShadowRun team sits with hypercare experts and watches triage and fixes
  2. Weeks 3–4Reverse shadowRun team handles tickets; project experts watch and coach
  3. Week 5First line aloneRun team owns first and second line; project experts on call
  4. Week 6AcceptanceHandover pack reviewed; open items accepted; sign-off
A staged transition from project to run, overlapping hypercare.
The Sign-Off Table · thesignofftable.com/academy/sap-pmo-302

Shadowing and reverse shadowing are where real knowledge moves. A document describing the billing interface is useful; watching an expert diagnose a failing message three times, then doing it yourself while they watch, is what makes the run team able to fix it at 06:00 on a Monday.

Operating model decisions to settle

  • How changes are requested, prioritized and approved after go-live, and by whom.
  • Release rhythm: how often transports move to production, and how SAP feature pack stacks and corrections fit in.
  • Service levels for each priority and how they are reported.
  • Who owns monitoring alerts and the response to them, by area.
  • Who owns the regression test suite and runs it before each release.
  1. RequestBusiness raises a change or ticket
  2. PrioritizeProcess owner sets business priority
  3. Build and testRun team or partner builds; tests in quality system
  4. RegressionAffected processes regression tested
  5. Approve and releaseChange approved; transported in the release slot
The steady-state change path the run organization inherits. It should be agreed before handover, not invented after.
The Sign-Off Table · thesignofftable.com/academy/sap-pmo-302

Test the handover, do not assume it

Treat the handover like any other deliverable: define acceptance criteria and test them. During the week when the run team works first line alone, track how many tickets it resolves without escalating to project experts, how long resolution takes compared with hypercare, and which areas still need help. If the run team escalates every interface ticket, the interface has not been handed over, whatever the document says. At Contoso the acceptance criterion was simple: in the solo week, the application support team resolved at least 80 percent of tickets without project help, and every escalation had a knowledge transfer action.

Under RISE, also confirm the operational contacts on the SAP side: who receives service requests from the run team, how system operations such as backups and restores are requested, and how SAP Support incidents are raised and escalated. These contacts often sat with the technical lead of the project during the program and must move to the run team by name.

What would you do?

In week five, the application support team says it does not understand the custom interface to the carrier and does not want to accept it. The integration consultant leaves the project next week. What should Grace do?

Key points
  • Handover is a staged transition: shadow, reverse shadow, first line alone, acceptance.
  • The handover pack covers tickets, known errors, documentation, runbooks, monitoring, test assets and contacts.
  • Settle the steady-state change path, release rhythm, service levels and test ownership before exit.
  • Avoid the cliff edge: overlap teams and keep short on-call cover from key experts.

Check your understanding · not graded

Lesson check

  1. 1. What is reverse shadowing?

  2. 2. Why include test assets in the handover pack?

  3. 3. Which is a sign of a cliff-edge handover?

  4. 4. Under RISE, what helps define which technical operations SAP performs after go-live?