Now accepting guest editorial from SAP, Oracle, Workday and ServiceNow practitioners.Pitch a guide
The Sign-Off Table

Lesson 5 of 5

Readiness input to go/no-go

7 min

The go/no-go decision is taken by the steering group, informed by the process owners. Key users do not decide, but their input is what the decision rests on: they know whether their colleagues are trained, whether the data is right and whether the processes work. This lesson is about giving that input honestly and usefully.

What the go/no-go meeting weighs

TestingTest cycles complete; critical defects closed; open defects with workarounds
DataMigrated data accepted per object, exceptions listed
PeopleUsers trained and checked; work instructions published; key users available for hypercare
CutoverPlan on track; rehearsal results; rollback point understood
SupportHypercare team, ticket process and escalation paths ready
Inputs to a go/no-go decision. Key users contribute to every layer.
The Sign-Off Table · thesignofftable.com/academy/sap-bku-206

The criteria should be agreed weeks before the meeting, not on the day. Typical ones: all critical scenarios passed; no open critical or high defects without an accepted workaround; a stated share of users trained and checked; migrated data accepted; cutover rehearsal completed within the planned time; hypercare staffed. When criteria are set in advance, the meeting compares facts with thresholds instead of debating what "ready" means.

The key user's readiness statement

For your area, prepare a short statement against agreed criteria. Grace, Contoso's PMO lead, collects them in one format so the steering group can compare areas.

CriterionMaria's status for order to cashEvidence
Critical scenarios passed in UATMet: 42 of 42UAT report in SAP Cloud ALM
Open defectsMet with exception: 2 medium, both with workaroundsDefect list with workarounds documented
Users trained and checkedNot yet met: 30 of 32; 2 billing clerks on ThursdayPractical check results per person
Work instructions publishedMet: 18 instructions, versionedInstruction library
Data acceptedMet in dress rehearsal; production on go-live weekendAcceptance records
Hypercare coverMet: Maria and two key users on site weeks 1 to 2Hypercare roster

A key user readiness statement against agreed criteria.

Being honest under pressure

Go-live dates attract pressure. It is tempting to round "almost" up to "yes". Resist it. A key user who reports an unmet criterion clearly gives the steering group options: a workaround, extra support, a conditional go, a delay. A key user who hides it gives them a surprise on Monday. Process owners should welcome bad news early; if your project punishes it, raise that with your process owner, because it is a risk in itself.

  1. Is the criterion met with evidence?Yes → report met · No → next question
  2. Is there a workaround that the business can operate for a defined time?Yes → report met with exception, naming the workaround, owner and end date · No → next question
  3. Will it be met before go-live?Yes → report not yet met, with the date and the consequence if it slips · No → report not met and its business impact
Choosing an honest status for each criterion.
The Sign-Off Table · thesignofftable.com/academy/sap-bku-206

After the decision

Whatever the decision, key users turn it into action. A "go with conditions" means owning the conditions: the two untrained billing clerks are trained on Thursday and checked, the workaround for the medium defect is in the work instruction, and the hypercare roster covers the risk. A "no-go" means a new plan with clear targets for the next attempt. The process owner then signs the business side of cutover, using the key users' evidence; the Academy's process owner courses cover that sign-off.

  1. CollectKey users prepare statements against criteria with evidence
  2. ConsolidatePMO combines areas; process owners review
  3. DecideSteering group decides go, conditional go or no-go
  4. ActKey users own conditions, workarounds and hypercare cover
From key user input to action.
The Sign-Off Table · thesignofftable.com/academy/sap-bku-206

What would you do?

Contoso's go/no-go meeting is tomorrow. Maria's area meets all criteria except one: the returns process has a medium defect, and the workaround requires a manual credit memo that only Maria knows how to create. What should her statement say?

Key points
  • The steering group decides go/no-go; key user evidence informs it.
  • Report each criterion as met, met with exception, or not met, with evidence.
  • Name workarounds, owners and dates for every exception.
  • Report bad news early and clearly; it creates options.
  • After the decision, own the conditions and hypercare cover in your area.

Check your understanding · not graded

Lesson check

  1. 1. Who takes the go/no-go decision?

  2. 2. Which is an acceptable status line?

  3. 3. When is "met with exception" appropriate?

  4. 4. After a conditional go, what do key users do?