Now accepting guest editorial from SAP, Oracle, Workday and ServiceNow practitioners.Pitch a guide
The Sign-Off Table

Lesson 1 of 5

High availability versus disaster recovery

9 min

Listen to this lesson

0:00 / 5:42

High availability (HA) and disaster recovery (DR) are often mentioned in one breath, but they protect against different things. HA keeps a system running through the failure of a single component, such as a server, a process or a disk, usually within one site and with little or no data loss. DR restores service after the loss of a whole site or region, usually at a distant location, and accepts some data loss and a longer outage. A landscape needs both, and neither replaces backups, which protect against the failures that replication faithfully copies, such as a wrong mass update or corrupted data.

High availabilitySingle component or host fails; automatic or fast takeover nearby; data loss close to zero
Disaster recoveryA site or region is lost; failover to a distant site; some data loss and a longer outage accepted
Backup and restoreLogical errors, corruption, deletion; restore to a point in time; slowest, but the last line of defense
Three layers of protection. Each one covers failures the others cannot.
The Sign-Off Table · thesignofftable.com/academy/sap-bas-303

Single points of failure in an ABAP system

ComponentWhy it mattersTypical HA measure
ABAP central services (ASCS): message server and enqueue serverOne per system; without it, logons and locks stopCluster failover of ASCS, with the enqueue replication server (ERS) keeping a copy of the lock table
Application server instancesUsers and jobs run hereSeveral instances (N+1) behind logon groups, so losing one is tolerable
SAP HANA databaseAll data lives hereSAP HANA system replication to a standby, often with cluster-controlled takeover
Shared file systems and networkTransport directory, profiles, interfacesRedundant storage and network paths

Where an ABAP system can fail and the usual HA answer. Architecture details vary by platform.

The usual HA answer for each single point of failure in an ABAP system like CMP.
The Sign-Off Table · thesignofftable.com/academy/sap-bas-303

HA and DR both copy changes to another place, which is why they cannot fix logical errors. If Ana accidentally posts 2,000 duplicate supplier invoices, replication sends every one of them to the standby within seconds. Only a point-in-time restore from backups and logs, or a business correction, helps then. Keep that in mind when someone says the system is safe because it is replicated.

Replication copies mistakes as faithfully as good data: only a point-in-time restore or a business correction undoes a logical error.
The Sign-Off Table · thesignofftable.com/academy/sap-bas-303

Testers meet these layers more often than they think. A test system without HA restarts after a host failure and loses the work in flight; a quality system that is a restored copy of production shows data as of the backup time; and a test of a long-running job may be interrupted by a planned takeover in a maintenance window. Knowing which layer is in play explains results that otherwise look like application defects.

Who does what under RISE

Contoso's CMP runs in SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition under RISE. In SAP's roles and responsibilities document (v.3-2025; later versions such as v7-2025 exist, so check the one attached to your contract), managing standby databases with SAP HANA system replication for high availability is a standard service for productive systems, but only if dedicated standby databases are in the contract, and the document notes that failover tests are not performed regularly per system. Disaster recovery is an optional service, provided only if it is in the contract. Backups and their monitoring are standard services. Developing DR procedures for the parts in the customer's responsibility, such as interfaces, connectivity and organizational measures, is an excluded task: Contoso's own job.

AreaSAP ECS (per R&R, if contracted)Contoso
BackupsDatabase and log backups per policy; monitoring of backupsDecide retention needs; validate restored data
HAManage HANA system replication standby for production, if in contractDesign expectations; test what users experience
DROptional service: set-up, replication monitoring, failover execution in a DR testDR procedures for interfaces and organization; functional tests
Sign-offExecutes technical stepsSigns off that recovery works for the business
The responsibility split for Contoso, summarized from SAP's RISE R&R. Your contract is the reference.
The Sign-Off Table · thesignofftable.com/academy/sap-bas-303

What would you do?

In a steering meeting, someone says Contoso does not need to discuss disaster recovery because 'RISE includes high availability'. Grace asks Sam to respond. What is the most accurate answer?

Key points
  • HA protects against component failures nearby with near-zero data loss; DR protects against losing a site.
  • Backups protect against logical errors that HA and DR replicate faithfully.
  • Single points of failure: ASCS (with ERS), application servers (N+1), SAP HANA (system replication), storage and network.
  • Under RISE, the HA standby is a standard service if contracted, DR is optional, and customer-side DR procedures stay with the customer.

Check your understanding · not graded

Lesson check

  1. 1. Which failure does disaster recovery address that high availability does not?

  2. 2. Why can system replication not protect against a mistaken mass update?

  3. 3. What protects the lock table when the ASCS instance fails over?

  4. 4. Under SAP's RISE R&R, how is disaster recovery classified?