Now accepting guest editorial from SAP, Oracle, Workday and ServiceNow practitioners.Pitch a guide
The Sign-Off Table

Lesson 6 of 6

Hand-offs and owners

7 min

End-to-end tests rarely fail in the middle of a step. They fail at the hand-offs: the points where data and responsibility pass from one team to another. Each team tests its own step, everything passes, and then the first integrated run stops because the requisition MRP created has no source of supply, or the billing document cannot find a revenue account.

The hand-offs in the tour

FromToWhat is handed overTypical failure
Production planning (MRP)PurchasingPurchase requisitions for short componentsNo source of supply; requisition sits unassigned
PurchasingWarehousePurchase order to receive againstWrong plant or storage location on the PO
WarehouseAccounts payableGoods receipt to match the invoiceReceipt missing or late; invoice blocked
Production planningShop floor and warehouseReleased order with reservationsOrder not released; components not staged
ProductionControllingOrder costs to settleOrder not completed; variances unexplained
SalesShippingOrder due for deliveryShipping point or route not determined
ShippingBillingDelivery with goods issue postedGoods issue not posted; billing due list empty
BillingFinance (AR)Billing document posted to accountingAccount determination error; posting block
Master data teamEveryonePartners, products, prices, BOMsMissing org-level views; expired validity

Hand-offs in the integrated tour and how they typically break.

  1. Did the step create the document the next team needs?Yes → check its content · No → the sending step is incomplete
  2. Does the document carry the data the next step uses (plant, partner, account assignment)?Yes → check the receiving team's settings · No → defect in the sending step or its master data
  3. Can the receiving role find and process it with their own user ID?Yes → hand-off works · No → check worklists, authorizations and configuration on the receiving side
Diagnosing a failed hand-off.

Why hand-offs break

Hand-offs depend on settings owned by different people. The planner owns MRP settings, the buyer owns source lists, the finance team owns account determination, the master data team owns the views. When teams test in isolation, each uses data that suits its own step. Only an end-to-end run proves that the output of one team is valid input for the next. That is why integration testing exists as a separate phase, and why business process owners, not just IT, need to be in it.

Mapping each step to a sign-off owner

StepPerforms itSigns it off
MRP and planned ordersProduction plannerPlan-to-produce process owner
Purchase requisition and POPurchaserProcurement process owner
Goods receipts (PO and production)Warehouse clerkWarehouse or inventory lead
Production order executionProduction supervisor and operatorsManufacturing process owner
Supplier invoice and paymentAccounts payable accountantAP lead / controller
Sales order, delivery and billingSales rep, shipping specialist, billing clerkOrder-to-cash process owner
Incoming payment and clearingAccounts receivable accountantAR lead / controller
Settlement, inventory value and marginCost accountantController

A simple RACI-style view: who performs and who signs off.

A hand-off defect log

When a hand-off fails, log it so both sides can act. A useful entry names the sending step and its document number, the receiving step and role, what the receiving role saw (an empty worklist, an error message, a missing field), and the expected behavior. Assign it to the sending team by default, because most hand-off failures are caused by incomplete or wrong output, and ask the receiving team to confirm the rerun. Over a test cycle, the hand-off log becomes the most useful map of where your process design is fragile.

Running the tour as a test

  1. Use one set of master data through all three legs, as set up in lesson 1.
  2. Run each step with the role that performs it in real life, not a super-user.
  3. Record every document number and journal entry as you go.
  4. At each hand-off, have the receiving role find the work in their own worklist or app.
  5. Finish with the integrated finance checks from lesson 5.

What would you do?

Contoso's integrated test fails at billing: the billing due list is empty for the delivery, although the shipping team marked their test "passed" after creating the delivery. Who should own the fix and how should it be recorded?

Key points
  • Integrated tests usually fail at hand-offs, where data and responsibility change teams.
  • Each hand-off depends on settings owned by different people.
  • Map every step to a performer and a sign-off owner, and name an owner for each hand-off.
  • Run with real roles and have the receiving role find the work themselves.

Check your understanding · not graded

Lesson check

  1. 1. Why do end-to-end tests often fail at hand-off points?

  2. 2. MRP creates a requisition, but it stays unassigned. Which hand-off is affected?

  3. 3. Who should sign off settlement, inventory value and margin?

  4. 4. What does "own the seams" mean in sign-off?