Lesson 5 of 5
Sign-off package
7 min
Sign-off is a decision, and the sign-off package is what the decision rests on. It should let the controller, and later an auditor, see in one place what was tested, what the results were, what is still open, and what conditions apply. If someone asks a year from now why R2R was accepted, the package answers without anyone having to remember.
The coverage summary
Start with the coverage matrix from lesson 1, now filled with results. Show the percentage of accounts with a balance that were touched by at least one passed scenario, the close tasks that ran with evidence, and the scope items covered with their company variants. List the accepted gaps explicitly with Dan's reason. A short, honest gap list builds more trust than a claim of 100%.
Results and reconciliations
Include the integrated close comparison: expected versus actual by statement line, per company code (1710 and 1810) and per ledger (0L and 2L), with every difference explained. Add the subledger-to-G/L reconciliations, the ledger-to-ledger comparison against the difference register, the segment trial balances, and the intercompany reconciliation status for the 1710/1810 pair.
Risk acceptances and conditions
Each open defect that is not fixed needs a written risk acceptance: the defect, its misstatement risk, the compensating control, the owner, and the date by which it will be fixed. The controller can sign with conditions, for example "conditional on the default profit center reclassification control being executed at each month-end until defect 214 is fixed," or "conditional on a successful rerun of the IFRS valuation in the final cutover rehearsal." Conditions must be specific, owned and checkable.
| Item | Owner | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Coverage summary with accepted gaps | Priya | Complete |
| Integrated close comparison, 1710 and 1810, 0L and 2L | Dan's team | Complete, 0 unexplained differences |
| Subledger, ledger and intercompany reconciliations | G/L lead | Complete |
| Open defects with risk acceptances (3) | Priya, Dan | Signed |
| Conditions for go-live (2) | Dan, Luis | Tracked in cutover plan |
| Evidence index | Priya | Stored in the project's test management tool |
Contoso's R2R sign-off package checklist.
- AssemblePriya compiles coverage, results, defects and evidence index
- ReviewDan reviews with the G/L lead and the 1810 controller
- ChallengeOpen questions answered; package updated
- SignController signs, with conditions recorded
- TrackConditions monitored through cutover and the first close
Where the package fits in the program
In SAP Activate terms, R2R sign-off belongs at the end of the Realize phase, as input to the go-live decision in the Deploy phase. SAP Cloud ALM (or SAP Solution Manager on older landscapes) can hold the test plans, results and defects, which makes the evidence index a set of links rather than a folder of files. The first real month-end close after go-live is the final test, so keep the conditions alive until it is complete and reconciled.
Write the package for a reader who was not in the project. Use plain statements: "All 410 accounts with balances were touched by at least one passed scenario, except the 21 listed in appendix A, accepted by Dan on September 3." Avoid internal shorthand and test tool status codes. Keep the decision page to one page. An auditor reviewing the implementation, or a new controller a year later, should understand what was proven, what was accepted, and why, without asking anyone. That is also the best test of whether the package is complete: if a reasonable question cannot be answered from it, something is missing.
What would you do?
Dan is ready to sign R2R, but one high-risk defect is still open: IFRS valuation postings are missing for one currency. The fix is in transport and will be tested in the final cutover rehearsal next week. What should the sign-off say?
- The sign-off package holds the decision, coverage, results, open defects with risk acceptances, and an evidence index.
- Show accepted coverage gaps honestly.
- Conditional sign-off is legitimate when conditions are specific, owned and checkable.
- Keep conditions alive through cutover and the first production close.
Check your understanding · not graded
Lesson check
1. What must accompany each unfixed defect in the sign-off package?
2. Which is a well-formed sign-off condition?
3. When is the R2R sign-off really proven?